ORIGINAL Annals of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 1, No. 1, 27-31, 1987 The complementary role of Indium-111 labeled leukocyte imaging, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the evaluation of postoperative infection or abscess Kimiichi UNO,* Ketko IMAZEKI Noboru ARIMIZU,* Takamasa RYU ** Kaichi ISONO, ** Yusuke KITAKATA,*** Hirobumi KOHEN*** and Sadao UEMATSU**** *Department of Radiology, Chiba University **Department of Surgery II ***Kimitsu Central Hospital ****Central Division of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital We report our experiences with the combined use of indium-111 labeled leukocyte imaging (In-‡V WBC scan.), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) for evaluation of suspected postoperative infection or abscess, and discuss the complementary roles of these modalities. Postoperative abscesses or infections were diagnosed in 9 of 20 patients. All patients were correctly diagnosed by In-111 WBC imaging and 4 patients could not be diagnosed by US because of bowel gas. One false-positive CT examination and another artifact on CT images due to respiratory movements were obtained. The three modalities were found to be complementary : CT and US were efficient imaging methods for diagnosis and treatment of abscess. In-111 WBC imaging could estimate the activity of inflammation. Key words : Postoperative infection or abscess, US, CT, In-111 labeled leukocyte imaging INTRODUCTION MANY FEBRILE PATIENTS with suspected postoperative infection or abscess are severely ill. The performance of diagnostic procedure on such patients is often difficult and needs an emergency response to select either operative or conservative treatment. A variety of new noninvasive imaging techniques, including Gallium-67 citrate imaging (Ga-67 scan), computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US) and recent Indium-111 labeled leukocyte imaging (In-111 WBC scan) have been reported to be highly accurate in the identification of infectious foci.1-6 US and CT have become the useful methods of detecting abscesses and also of guiding percutaneous catheter drainage.7-9 Ga-67 scans for infection in the abdomen are generally misinterpreted because of the Received April 30, 1987; revision accepted April 30, 1987. For reprints contact : Kimiichi Uno, Department of Radiology, Chiba University School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana Chiba City, Chiba 280, JAPAN. presence of colonic activity or abdominal tumor. On the other hand, the use of In-111 WBC scans represent a 'functional' approach to detecting pus whether in an abscess or in other sites, and a reliable procedure for monitoring the activity of inflammation.10,11 With CT or US, it is rarely difficult to distinguish abscess cavities from other fluid collection but frequently is in estimating the activity of inflammation. We report here our experience with the combined use of In-111 WBC scans, CT and US for evaluation of suspected postoperative infection or abscess and discuss the complementary roles of these modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS The twenty cases including 18 men and 2 women, whose ages ranged from 27 to 81 years, were studied (Table 1). These patients, with fever and suspected postoperative infection or abscess, were tested with In-111 WBC scans, CT and US. Nineteen patients were evaluated with these three modalities and one was studied with CT and In-111 WBC scan. Needle drainages were performed under US guidance in four cases and the other four cases were drained surgically. Approximately 500 uCi of In- 111-labeled autologous leukocytesS using a modification of Thakur's method12,13 were injected intravenously. Whole-body images and spot views were obtained 24 hours following injection by using a gamma camera with medium energy collimeter. US was performed with a commercially available real-time gray scale ultrasonic scanner using 3.5 MHz focused transducer (U-sonic Model RT3000 and Toshiba SAL90A). CT was performed on the General Electric CT/T 8800 without contrast enhancement. RESULTS Postoperative abscesses or infections were diagnosed in 9 of 20 patients. Eight of the 9 diagnoses proved correct and were treated with needle aspirations under US guidance and surgical drainage (Figs. 1,2). SIndium-lll oxine: Amersham International PLC. One case with infected cyst showed rapid resolution of symptoms with administration of antibiotics. In the eleven patients with no surgical confirmation, the subsequent clinical course indicated that no infection had been present. All patients were correctly diagnosed by In-111 WBC imaging and 4 patients could not be diagnosed by US because bowel gas limited viewing, and the inflammation activity could not be estimated by US in one patient with infected cyst. One false-positive CT examination was obtained and another patient showing respiratory artifact could not be diagnosed by CT. The patient with esophageal varices (Case 6) was followed up four times by In-lll WBC imaging and showed varied activity of infection in the left upper quadrant during the subsequent clinical course (Figs. 3,4). DISCUSSION Abdominal abscesses or infections are usually post-operative complications. CT and US proved to be efficient imaging methods for diagnosis, for planning of therapeutic procedures, and in monitoring response to operative or conservative treatment.14 A good US examination requires considerable technical expertise. The presence of postoperative ileus, open wounds, abdominal dressings and abdominal tenderness may prevent optimal examination15. In our series US imaging was disturbed by intestinal gas in 5 cases. However, US may be used as a guide for percutaneous drainage of an abscess. CT is also of proven benefit in both the diagnosis and treatment of abscesses and can be used to guide percutaneous drainage of an abscess. As with US, there are limitations on CT and the performance of CT is hampered by respiratory movement of severely ill patients with pain. This problem will be solved by the new fast scan CT.16 In fact, although CT and US are extremely sensitive tools for delineating fluid collection, they usually cannot determine whether or not the fluid is infected. The use of In-111 WBC imaging represents a functional approach to detect pus and a reliable procedure for monitoring the activity of inflammation, except for a few reports of the false positive results due to swallowed leukocytes and bleeding.17 The three modalities were found to be complementary. CT and US were better when symptoms were focal and In-111 WBC scan was valuable when focal signs were absent and it could be used to estimate the activity of inflammation. REFERENCES 1. Korobkin M, Callen PW, Filly RA, et al: Comparison of computed tomography, ultrasonography, and gallium-67 scanning in the evaluation of suspected abdominal abscess. Radiology 129: 89-93, 1978 2. Biello DR, Levitt RG, Melson GL: The roles of gallium-67 scintigraphy, ultrasonography, and computed tomography in the detection of abdominal abscesses. Semin Nucl Med IX : 58-65, 1979 3. Knochel JQ, Koehler PR, Lee TG, et al: Diagnosis of abdominal abscesses with computed tomography, ultrasound, and In-lll leukocyte scans. Radiology 137 : 425-432, 1980 4. Carroll B, Silverman PM. Goodwin DA, et al : Ultrasonography and indium-111-white blood cell scanning for the detection of intraabdominal abscesses. Radiology 140: 155-160, 1981 5. McNeil BJ, Sanders R, Alderson PO, et al : A prospective study of computed tomography, ultrasound, and gallium imaging in patients with fever. Radiology 139 : 647-653, 1981 6. McAfee JG, Samin A: In-111 labeled leukocytes: A review of problems in image interpretation. Radiology 155: 221-229, 1985 7. Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ. Havrilla TR, et al : CT detection and aspiration of abdominal abscesses. AJR 128 : 465-474, 1977 8. Smith EH, Bartrum RJ, Jr : Ultrasonically guided percutaneous aspiration of abscesses. AJR 122 : 308-312, 1974 9. Clark RA, Towbin R : Abscess drainage with CT and ultrasound guidance. RCNA 21 : 445-459, 1983 10. Uno K, Matsui N, Nohira K, et al: Indiurn-111 leukocyte imaging in patient with rheumatoid arthritis. J Nucl Med 27 : 339-344, 1986 11. Goldman M, Ambrose NS, Drolc Z, et al : Indium-111-labeled leukocytes in the diagnosis of abdominal abscess. Br J Surg 74: 184-186, 1987 12. Thakur ML, Lavender JP, Arnot RN, et al : Indium-lll-labeled autologous leukocytes in man. J Nucl Med 18 : 1014-1021, 1977 13. Uno K: Basic and clinical study of In-111-0xine labeled leukocytes for detection of inflammatory foci. Nippon Act Radiol 42: 565-575, 1982 14. Wolverson MK, Jagannadharao B, Sundaram M, et al : CT as a primary diagnostic method in evaluating intraabdominal abscess. AJR 133: 1089-1095, 1979 15. Harber MD, Daffner RH, Morgan CL, et al: Intraabdominal abscess: current concepts in radiologic evaluation. AJR 133 : 9-13, 1979 16. Ryu M, Uno K, Mukai M, et al: Image diagnosis for intraabdominal infections. Progress in Acute Abdominal Medicine 4: 81-86, 1985 17. Carrier L, Picard D, Chatrand R, et al: Abdominal patterns of indium-111-labeled leukocyte imaging. Clin Nucl Med 11 : 153-157, 1986