TECHNICAL NOTES Annals of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 15, No. 5, 465-470, 2001 Simple and low-cost tele-nuclear medicine conference system with the e-mail protocol Hiroshi TOYAMA,*1,8 Yutaka EMOTO,*1 Kiyonobu ITO,*2 Shinji MIZUNo,*3 Ichiro OHASHI,*4 Mototoshi NAKAMURA,*5 Masayo NOMURA,*6 Kaname MATSUMURA,*7 Masanori ICHISE,*8 Nobuo KAKO,*3 Junko TOHYAMA,*9 Kazuko OHNO,*10 Yuri WATANABE,*7 Gen KUDO,*l Hidekazu HATTORI,*1 Kaoru KIKUKAWA,*1 Naoko FUJII,*1 Kouhei SENDA,*l Hiroaki HOSHI,*3 Sukehiko KOGA*1 and Kazuhiro KATADA*1 *1Fujita Health University, *2Hokushin General Hospital, *3Gifu University *4Tokoname City Hospital, 'ty, *8National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), *5JR Toukai General Hospital, *6Kainan Hospital, *7Mie Universl *9Nagoya City University, and *10Aichi Medical University Purpose: Because of the recent innovative growth in computer technology, digital imaging, and the Internet, we can take advantage of these facilities for education and clinical work in nuclear medicine. We developed a tele-nuclear medicine conference system with electronic mail (e-mail) on the Internet. Methods: Twenty-one physicians (20 radiologists, 1 neurologist), 6 technologists and 2 medical students in six university hospitals (Japan 5, Canada 1), 5 local hospitals in Japan participated in this project. We used digital still cameras (330 k pixels) equipped with a floppy disk drive and 10 x optical zoom to digitize images with JPEG compression (640 x 480 matrix). The images were attached to e-mail messages (containing a brief description of each case). The mail was sent simultaneously to all members on the mailing list. Scintigram and SPECT images as well as other radiological images were sent by e-mail. Reply mails about each case were sent to all members via the mailing list. Results: During a period of 6 months, 18 cases (tumor/infection: 7, bone: 6, cardiovascular: 1, neurology; 3, endocrine: 1) with 144 e-mails (average 5.6/case) were submitted to the conference. The average period of discussion was 15.6 days. The number of attached images was 1 to 9 (average, 4.2/e-mails). JPEG compression rate was 1/10 to 1/20. The quality of the images was good enough for discussion. Some cases required additional images for further discussion. Conclusion: Our tele-nuclear medicine conference with an electronic mailing list and digital camera was simple and low-cost. The conference system was useful for education and clinical work. Key words : Internet, e-mail, mailing list, tele-nuclear medicine INTRODUCTION TELEMEDIClNE can be defined as the "delivery of health care and sharing of medical knowledge over a distance using telecommunication systems "1 Historically, the telephone was the first medium for long distance medical consultation. In 1880 Alexander Graham Bell, the telephone Received June 18, 2001, revision accepted August 17, 2001. For reprint contact: Hiroshi Toyama, M.D.. Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake. Toyoake, Aich 470-1192, JAPAN. E-mail: htoyama@fujita-hu.acjp inventor, summoned his assistant by telephone for help when he had an accident in his laboratory.1 Interactive television was used for consultations in the field of psychiatry and radiology in the 1950-1960s,1,2 but those systems were inadequate, inconvenient, and expensive, and communication band width was limited.1 Telemedicine as well as the Internet have recently come to be widely used in nuclear medicine because of the innovative growth in computer technology. In the last decade, not only university hospitals but also local hospitals, which have nuclear medicine divisions, have replaced the single head gamma camera with a dual head system. Recent advances in this technology including improved collimator designs, attenuation-scatter correction, and sophisticated reconstruction algorithms have resulted in vast improvement in image quality.4-6 In addition, several new radiotracers such as brain perfusion7 and receptor ligand8 have become commercially available, but it has been difficult at local hospitals for general radiologists to interpret specialized nuclear medicine studies because of the lack of the current knowledge or expertise. On the other hand, it is quite difficult for "stand alone" Japanese radiologists in local hospitals to frequently attend nuclear medicine conferences for consultation and education purposes. In view of these circumstances, we developed a telenuclear medicine conference system with electronic mail (e-mail) on the Internet. In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness and limitations of this conference system for education and routine clinical work. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutions Twenty-one physicians (20 radiologists, 1 neurologist), 6 technologists and 2 medical students in 6 university hospitals and 5 local hospitals in Japan participated in this project (Table 1 ), Nine hospitals were located in the same distnct "Tokai" m Japan; 6 in Aichi Prefecture, 2 in Mie Prefecture, 1 in Gifu Prefecture, and 1 hospital was in Nagano Prefecture in the "Koshinetsu" region. In addition, 1 hospital in Toronto. Canada also participated in this project. All hospitals had a nuclear medicine division and SPECT devices. Internet Systems We used communication between individuals by e-mail through local Internet service providers (ISP).3 Communications were made between computers (PC and Macintosh) with e-mail software, modems or local area network (LAN) in the hospital. The type of hardware or operating system was not specified. With respect to communication lines to the Internet, the exclusive line at the university hospitals, and analog telephone lines or integrated service digital networks (ISDN) at local hospitals were used. The e-mail addresses of participants were added to the mailing list. The mail was first sent to the mailing list, and then distributed to all members on the list (Fig. 1). Hardware We used digital still cameras (SONY Digital Mavica, MVC-FD71, 330 k pixels) equipped with a 10 x optical zoom lens to digitize images by means of JPEG compression protocol (640 x 480 matrix), and they were then stored on 3.5 inch floppy disks (Fig. 2). Each case was sent by e-mail with a brief description in Japanese text together with attached image files (Figs. 1 and 3). The mail was sent to all members on the mailing list at once via the common address ("RISOS") in addition to sending other radiological images and nuclear medicine images. Reply mail (Japanese or English) from members who sent comments was sent to all members via the mailing list. Operation Guideline Each case was submitted with the patient's age, gender, classification of the case (e.g., tumor, cardiovascular disease), brief history and discussion or consultation points. The patient's name and identification number were withheld to ensure privacy. Attached images were limited to a maximum of 6 images for each case, to avoid overloading the network system. Sending comments about each case was at the member's own free will. If the first submitted text or images of the case were insufficient, additional information or images were sent during the discussion (Table 2). If the final diagnosis was confirmed, the result was reported later. All procedures conducted in this project were voluntary and none of the participants received a financial reward. RESULTS Over a period of 6 months (May 26-November 1, 1999), 18 cases (tumor/infection: 7, bone diseases: 6, cardiovascular disease: 1, neurological diseases: 3, endocrine disorder: 1) were submitted to the conference (Table 2). The total number of e-mail messages was 144 with an average of 5.6 e-mail/case. The average period of discussion was 15.6 days (in fact, 9. 1 days, except for one case which took 139 days). The total number of e-mail messages with attached images was 38. The average number of attached images was 4.2, and minimum number of attached images was 1, and the maximum number of attached images was 9 (Table 2). The JPEG compression rate was 1110 to 1/20. Image quality was adequate for the purpose of general case discussion (Fig. 4). Some cases required additional images to be sent for further discussion (Table 2). Several cases presented required sending biopsy or autopsy results before the final diagnosis could be established. All images submitted were readable and of good quality for discussion. The majority of the important nuclear medicine images could be sent at once, because they were fewer in number than CT and MRI images. Most of the cases or comments were submitted by the staff radiologists or experts in this conference. Several problems were encountered during the project, which were rectified by the following solutions. In PCs running the Windows operating system, some images sent as attached files could not be recognized as image files due to the lack of a proper filename extension and thus could not be opened automatically. This problem was corrected by sending each image with a full file name set as file name.jpg. At first, connection to e-mail was interrupted due to the attachment of several images to the same message when using analog phone lines. This problem was later corrected by attaching a maximum of 6 image files and using ISDN and major ISPs, but the limited number of images exchanged between participants created another problem: missing information, particularly on originally consecutive CT and MRI images (Cases 3 and 4). Additional images, which were sent during the discussion, were supplemented. The Japanese physician in Canada was unable to use Japanese e-mail software because of the English Operating system at the time. Therefore, Japanese E-mail which was transformed to image data with a Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) file was sent without using the mailing list. DISCUSSION Advantages The Internet is a telecommunications structure linking together millions of computers on all continents of the world.9 Due to the standardization of communication protocols on the Internet, any computer, regardless of the type of hardware or operating system could connect to the Internet. In addition, the cost of accessing the Internet for individuals has fallen to the present rate of US$20 or less per month for unlimited access 9 In this regard, our system was widely available in all hospitals, because several institutions were able to participate even with a personal analog telephone line or ISDN without an exclusive line. Furthermore, there is no need for special equipment except for a digital camera (US$740) and personal computer. For tele-radiology, all images must be in digital form before transmission is possible. Conventional hard copy images from any mode can be digitized by laser scanners or charge coupled device (CCD) scanners.1 If digital images are in a standard DICOM (Digital Image Communication in Medicine) format, they can be directly linked to a teleradiology system,1 but the file size of typical digitized medical images is too large. The digital data should therefore be compressed prior to transmission for both practical and economic reasons,1 Our image acquisition method, in which images were obtained by means of a digital camera and stored on floppy disks, was simple and easy. Images were automatically compressed to 1/10 to 1/20 with JPEG compression. Although compression results in some loss of the original data set, several studies have shown that compression ratios of 1/20 or higher can be achieved, without sacrificing diagnostic image content.10 The quality of the images in our project was actually good enough for discussion. All procedures including the following step of attaching image files to e-mail directly through the floppy disk drive were practical in daily clinical work. Health-care professionals will gain experience and expertise through the interaction with experts, and higher accuracy should be achieved,1,2 Use-ful comments from subspecialists and discussion between distant institutions were actually significant in daily clinical work. Several institutions have designed world-wide web (WWW) sites to upload nuclear medicine teaching files.3,11 We can access those sites freely at a number of institutions 3 Not only radiology and nuclear medicine specialists but also radiology residents, radiological technologists and medical students participated in our project. Most of the cases or comments were submitted to this conference by experts, but typical or rare cases were made significant in education by examining the images, i.e., "observer" through the discussion on the Internet. Generally speaking, small size nuclear medicine images are well suited for creating digital data 1,3 In addition, nuclear medicine images were found to be more suitable than other CT and MRI images, because most of the scintigrams with fewer images could be sent in a single e-mail. Limitations, Problems and Plans We were sending comments in Japanese as image files as opposed to e-mails in Japanese to a collaborating physician in Canada because Japanese e-mails could not be displayed on his English operating system, but those problems have been solved by recent operating system upgrades that allow the use of several languages. Because of the long transmission times with dial-up telephone line faced by some participants in local hospitals (actually, at home), interruption of connection occurred frequently. We tried to send only as few selected images as possible with JPEG compression, but we had to send several images, i.e., beyond the set limit, in some cases several times, especially with consecutive CT and MRI images. Improvement of transmission media with wider bandwidths should allow much faster and more detailed consultations for any types of imaging methods to remote experts.1,2 At present, as WWW, newsgroups and discussion forums are used,3 we are planning to use a multi-media conference system and a website encrypted with a user name and password. The present system as well as the future website system requires strict security and privacy assurance.2 Such a tele-conference system could be used as an important tool for educational purposes, such as a teaching file database, after establishing general Internet ethics guidelines for sharing and cooperation. CONCLUSIONS Our tele-nuclear medicine conference with an electronic mailing list and digital camera is simple, low-cost, and widely available. The system has allowed discussion at a distance. This conference system is useful for education and clinical work. Nuclear medicine should be admirably suited to tele-medicine because of the fewer and smaller but informative images. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors gratefully acknowledge all members and participating institutions in "RISOS" projects for their sincere comments and help. We also thank the Telecommunications Advancement Foundation (TAF) for financial support. This paper was presented and awarded a prize for the best scientific exhibit at the 7th Asia and Oceania Congress of Nuclear Medicine and Biology held in Istanbul, Turkey, between October 1 and 5, 2000. REFERENCES 1. Thrall JH. Boland G. Telemedicine in practice. Semin Nucl Med 1998; 28: 145-157. 2. Levine SR. Gorman M. "Telestroke"-The application of telemedicine for stroke-. Stroke 1999; 30: 464-469. 3. Suzuki Y. Nakamura M. Internet in nuclear medicine. Ann Nucl Med 1997; 11: 7-13. 4. Jaszczak RJ. SPECT: State-of-the art scanner and recon-struction strategies. In Radiopharmaceuticals and Brain Pathology Studies with PET and SPECT, Diksic M, Reba RC (eds), Boca Raton; CRC Press, 1991: 93-118. 5. Ogawa K. Simulation study of triple-energy-window scatter correction in combined Tl-201, Tc-99m SPECT. Ann Nucl Med 1994; 8: 277-281. 6. Blocklet D, Seret A, Popa N, Schoutens A. Maximum-likelihood reconstruction with ordered subsets in bone SPECT. J Nucl Med 1999; 40: 1978-1984. 7. Reba RC, Holman BL. Brain perfusion radiotracers. In Radiopharmaceuticals and Brain Pathology Studies with PET and SPECT. Diksic M, Reba RC (eds), Boca Raton; CRC Press, 1991: 35-39. 8. Ha-Kawa SK, Tanaka Y. A quantitative model of Tc-99m DTPA-galactosyl-HSA for the assessment of hepatic blood flow and hepatic binding receptor. J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 2233-2240. 9. Glowniak J. History, structure, and function of the internet. Semin Nucl Med 1998; 28: 135-144. 10. Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, Bhalla MP, Blickman JG, Bramson RT, et al. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR 1994; 163: 463-468. 11. Wallis JW, Parker JA. Use of the internet for teaching in nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med 1998; 28: 165-176.