ORIGINAL ARTICLE Annals of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 14, No. 4, 239-245, 2000 Palliative analgesic effect of Re-186 HEDP in various cancer patients with bone metastases N.O. KUCUK,* E.IBIS,* G.ARAS,* S.BALTACI,** G.OZALP,**** Y.BEDUK,** N.CANAKCI*** and A.SOYLU* Departments of *Nuclear Medicine, **Urology and ***Anesthesiology, Ankara University Medical School, and ****Ankara Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey The clinical picture of bone metastases is manifested by pain and loss of mechanical stability. Standard treatment options for bone metastases include external beam radiotherapy and the use of analgesics. Due to a large number of lesions in many patients, the use of radionuclide therapy with beta emitters may be preferable. Re-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (Re-186 HEDP) is one of the radiopharmaceuticals suitable for palliative treatment of metastatic bone pain. The aim of this study was to investigate palliative and side effects of Re-186 HEDP in patients with different types of cancers. Material & Method: Thirty one (17 male, 14 female) patients with various cancers (10 prostate, 10 breast, 4 rectum, 5 lung, 2 nasopharynx) and bone metastases were included in the study. Therapy was started with a fixed dose of 1295 MBq of Re-186 HEDP. If necessary, the same dose was repeated at least 3 times after an interval of 10-12 weeks; A total of 40 standard doses were given; 6 patients received repeated doses (3 doses in 3 patients, 2 doses in 3 patients). The patients with bone marrow suppression were excluded from the study. The pain relief was assessed the Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group (ECOG) and the Karnofsky status index. All patients were evaluated with standard evaluation forms filled in dally for a maximum of 10 weeks. Results: The mean response rate was 87.5% in patients with breast and prostate cancer, 75% in patients with rectum cancer and 20% in patients with lung cancer. The overall response rate was 67.5%. The palliation period varied between 6 and 10 weeks, with a mean of 8.1+-1.3 weeks. The maximal palliation effect was observed between the 3rd and 7th weeks. No serious side effects were seen except mild hematologic toxicity. Discussion & Conclusion: It is concluded that Re-186 HEDP is a highly effective agent in the palliation of metastatic bone pain in patients with prostate, breast and rectum cancer, but not effective in lung cancer. On the other hand, Re-186 seems to be a good alternative to Sr-89 because of its preferable physical characteristics (such as short half life and gamma energy emission), low side effect profile, early response and repeatability. Key words: bone metastases, Re-186 HEDP, pain palliation INTRODUCTION BONE METASTASES are often the first presentation of distant disease in patients with cancer, especially prostate, breast and lung cancer,1 The clinical picture of bone metastases is manifested by pain and loss of mechanical stability. The condition is incurable and the only chance is palliative therapy which includes hormonal application, chemo- Received October 27, 1999, revision accepted April 20, 2000. For reprint contact: N. Ozlem Kucuk, M.D., Ankara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Nukleer Tip Anabilim Dali, 06100 Cebeci, Ankara, TURKIYE. therapy and radiotherapy.2 Standard treatment options for bone metastases are external beam radiotherapy and use of analgesic drugs.3-6 Due to the large number of lesions in many patients, radionuclide therapy with specifically localized internal beta emitters may be preferable.7,8 The use of radioisotopes in palliative therapy9 of bone metastases have started with P-32 (Phosphore)10-13 and continued with Sr-89 (strontium),14-16 Sm-153 (Samarium) EDTMP,17-21 Sn-117m (Tin) DTPA,22,23 Iodine-131 labeled diphosphonate24 and Re-186 (Rhenium).25-35 Favorable responses in patients with bone metastases of cancers were obtained with Sr-89, Unfortunately this radionuclide has a relatively long physical half life and does not emit gamma rays for post therapy quantitative imaging. Recently Re-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (Re-186 HEDP) has been proposed for pain palliation in patients with metastatic bone lesions.25,26 Initial results showed that Re-186 HEDP is able to reduce pain caused by bone metastases. Because of its proper imaging qualities, 1.07 MeV beta radiation and physical half life, it has found wide use in palliative therapy of bone metastases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of Re-186 HEDP in terms of pain relief as well as benefit from repeated doses and unwanted effects in patients with different types of cancer with bone metastases. MATERIAL AND METHOD Thirty-one patients with various cancer including 10 prostate, 10 breast, 4 rectum, 5 lung and 2 nasopharynx carcinoma (17 males, 14 females, mean age: 58+-5 years old, range 39-84 years old) were given Re-186 HEDP (Mallinckrodt, Holland), reaching a total of 40 standard doses (1295 MBq). Some of them received repeated doses of the same activity at 3 month intervals. The criteria are shown below. 1. At least four bone metastases demonstrated in the bone scan, 2. A Karnofsky performance status of a maximum 60% (Table 1), 3. At least 4.0 x 1000 leukocyte and 150 x 1000 platelet counts/mm3, 4. Normal renal functions (30 mmol/lt serum creatinin concentration or less), 5. At least 3 months life expectancy. The patients with either bone marrow suppression or signs of nerve compression were excluded from the study. Tc-99m Methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy was performed and bone scan indices (BSI) were evaluated before the treatment. According to Blake et al.14 BSI is a diagnostic tool to provide an index of metastatic disease. This method divides the skeleton into four anatomical regions: 1. spine and skull, 2. pelvis, 3. shoulder girdle and ribs, 4. extremities. Each region is scored visually on a scale of zero to ten for the apparent proposition of the skeleton involved. Scores for each region are summed and the sum is normalized to a scale of zero to hundred as an index of the extent of metastatic involvement. The response rate is evaluated with Karnofsky and Eastern Cooperative Oncologic Group (ECOG) status indices (Table 1). 0-1 was defined as complete response, 2 as partial response and 3-4 as poor response on the ECOG scale. A standard dose of 1295 MBq Re-186 HEDP was given intravenously to the patients by slow infusion. The patients were kept in the nuclear medicine department for 6 hours after the injection. The next day, anterior and posterior whole body scanning was performed. The daily symptomatic status of patients was recorded, whereas blood analysis was performed weekly for 8 weeks after the therapy. A control Tc-99m MDP scintigraphy was performed approximately 30 days after the therapy. Especially for patients who did not have any pain relief despite therapy, a comparison of the number and intensity of metastases was made by means of bone scintigraphy to determine the cause of pain increase. RESULTS The overall response rate was 67.5%. The palliation period varied between 6 and 10 weeks, with a mean of 8.1+-1.3 weeks. The maximal palliation effect was observed between the 3rd and the 7th weeks. No serious side effects were seen except mild hematologic toxicity. Prostate cancer Ten patients, who had multiple metastases and did not respond to hormonal and/or analgesic therapy, received Re-186 HEDP (Table 2). All had chemotherapy (5 of them had radiotherapy) and high prostate specific antigen (PSA) (mean 67+-13 IU/ml, 28-258 IU/ml) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) levels (mean 58+-45 IU/ml, 3-100 IU/ml) before the therapy. Platelet and leukocyte counts and liver and kidney functions were within normal limits. A total of 14 doses were applied (2 patients received 2 doses, 1 received 3 doses and the remaining 7 received 1 dose). Six patients showed complete remission, 2 had partial remission, 2 did not respond at all. The response was observed at the end of the first week and continued up to 8-10 weeks. Four patients showed signs of the flare up phenomen. All had a decline in platelet and leukocyte counts starting at the end of the first week and it continued to decline for 4-5 weeks and reached the normal level within 5-6 weeks. Biochemical blood analyses of kidney and liver functions remained normal whereas the alkaline phosphatase levels declined within 4 weeks after therapy. PSA levels increased 20% after therapy in 4 weeks and PAP values showed about a 10% decrease after therapy. Breast cancer Ten female patients (9 infiltrative ductal carcinoma, 1 mucinous adenocarcinoma) received 12 standard doses of Re-186 HEDP (Table 3). Two were considered to be inoperable and the others had modified radical mastectomy and lymph node resection. All patients received chemotherapy and hormonotherapy and 8 of them also received radiotherapy. Four patients showed signs of complete response (Fig. 1). The other four had a decrease in the pain level, but still needed low dose analgesics. The performance status was high in all 4 patients. Only 2 patients did not experience any decrease in pain. The flare up phenomenon was observed in two patients who had complete response. No neurologic effects were observed. The decrease in thrombocyte counts was slightly greater than that of leucocytes, but they returned to the original level in 6-7 weeks after treatment (20% fall in thrombocytes and 15% fall in leucocytes). Similarly to prostate cancer, alkaline phosphatase showed a decrease within 4 weeks after treatment (105+-41 IU/dl) but returned to the same level at the end of 6-8 weeks. No change was observed in carcinogenic antigen (CA) 15-5 or carcinoembriogenic antigen (CEA) levels except in two patients who showed a 10% decrease in CA 15-5. Nasopharynx cancer Two patients received Re-186 therapy (Table 4). One did not show any response and died in the fifth week. The other patient, who refused chemotherapy and volunteered for Re-186 HEDP therapy, responded well. The response started at the end of the first week but this patient died in the sixth week. We could not evaluate the duration of palliation. Hematologic side effects were not observed to be at dangerous levels. Lung cancer Five male patients were treated with Re-186 HEDP (Table 5). None of them was operated on and all of them received chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Only two patients experienced pain relief and decrease in use of analgesics. Others did not seem to respond. No important side effects were observed. Rectal cancer Two female and 2 male patients received Re-186 HEDP (Table 6). Two patients showed complete response, one partial response and one poor response. The one with complete response (case 2), had pain again at the end of 8 weeks and received a second dose. The response of the second dose was complete and treatment was repeated 8 weeks after the second dose. The thrombocyte and leucocyte levels were decreased slightly after the first treatment and the degree of hematological effects increased after the second and third doses. The hematological toxicity decreased 30-40% after the third dose. The length of the painless period decreased slowly after the third treatment. DISCUSSION Radioisotopes have been used with the purpose of palliation of pain due to bone metastases. High pain palliation rates were obtained; 60-90% with Sr-89,14-16 80-90% with Re-186 HEDP,25 and 70-80% with Sm-15319-21 in cases of prostate cancer. In our study, complete or partial response was found in 8 of 10 patients with prostate cancer and in 8 of 10 patients with breast cancer. This result was consistent with the literature. Re-186 HEDP was given to 2 patients with nasopharynx cancer; response to therapy has been observed in one of them, but the other died before any kind of evaluation. The number of patients in this group was too small for discussion. There was no evidence of palliation in patients with lung cancer. Only two of 5 patients experienced pain relief and decrease in the use of analgesics. Possible mechanisms were thought to be high cellular turnover rates and/or pleural and/or neural invasions in the early stages. There are no results in the literature on patients with rectal cancer. Despite the limitation in the number, we found a 75% palliation rate in this group. We concluded that further investigation with more patients is needed. The duration of palliation was reported to be 3-6 months for Sr-89,16 6-10 weeks for Re-186 HEDP,26-28 and 4-8 weeks for Sm-15317,21 in the literature. Despite the relatively long palliation period with Sr-89,14 it is not widely used because of retardation of therapeutic response and more side effects. The long palliation period of up to 8-10 weeks observed in our study can be accepted as a satisfactory level when repeatability of the therapy is taken into account. In an early stage after radionuclide palliative therapy, an increase in the pain level (flare up) is observed. Later, a major consequence is bone marrow toxicity. Flare up was observed in 10% of cases with Sr-8915 and similar results have been reported with Re-186 HEDP.30 This observation has been thought to be due to cellular necrosis in the early stage and/or secreted mediators during this process. The flare up phenomenon is reported to be seen more often in cases of multiple metastases and patients with this phenomenon respond better to the therapy than those without. We observed flare up phenomenon in 6 of 31 cases in our series. BSI rates and responsiveness to therapy were higher in these cases. Flare up phenomenon was thought to be a possible early indicator of responsiveness to therapy. No distinct data were obtained with either Sm-153 or Sn-117m. Bone marrow toxicity is the most important side effect of the therapy and it is more prominent with P-32,13 but can be seen with Sr-89 also.15 It is the major limitation in the use of P-32. It is observed with Sr-89 after the 4th week at the rate of 20-30%.15 This effect has been reported to be seen at a lower rate and for a shorter period with Re-186 HEDP.31 Sm-15318 and Sn-117m22,23 are today's choices because of lower side effect profiles. In our study we observed bone marrow suppression an average of 4 weeks after the therapy in 15-20% of our cases. Repeated therapy caused an increase in side effects but none of the patients needed a blood transfusion and no permanent bone marrow suppression was observed. A temporary decrease in alkaline phosphatase levels was observed and these observation were correlated with other pharmaceutical studies.36 Temporary decreases in PSA levels in patients with prostate cancer have been reported.37 No change in other tumor markers has been observed. Changes in PSA levels have been observed with Re-186 HEDP.35 In our study, changes in PSA levels were observed in patients with prostate cancer; these changes were thought to be due to PSA subtypes and necrosis in bone lesions was concluded to cause a rise in the blood PSA level. Neurological side effects have been reported after radionuclide therapy, especially in patients with parietal and temporal metastases. Re-186 HEDP therapy has been found to cause symptoms of neurological compression.29,30 We did not observe any neurological symptoms in our patients. Sites of metastases and the possible relationship with nerves were thought to be responsible for neurological side effects. CONCLUSION It is concluded that Re-186 HEDP is a highly effective agent in the palliation of metastatic bone pain in patients with prostate, breast and rectum cancer, but not effective in lung cancer. On the other hand, Re-186 seems to be a good alternative to Sr-89 because of its preferable physical characteristics (short half life and gamma energy emission), low side effect profile, early response and repeatability. REFERENCES 1. Nielson OS, Munro AJ, Tannock IF. Bone metastases; pathophysiology and management policy. J Clin Oncol 9: 509-524, 1991. 2. Hoskin PJ. Palliation of bone metastases. Eur J Cancer 27: 950-951, 1991. 3. Kuban DA, Delbridge T, el-Mahdi AM, Schellhammer PF. Half-body irradiation for treatment of widely metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 141: 572-574, 1989. 4. Arcangeli G, Micheli A, Arcangeli G, Giannarelli D, La Pasta O, Tolis A, et al. The responsiveness of bone metastases to radiotherapy: the effect of site, histology and radiation dose on pain relief. Radiother Oncol 14: 95-101, 1989. 5. Lipton A, Glover D, Harvey H, Grabelsky S, Zelenakas K, Macerata R, et al. Pamidronate in the treatment of bone metastases: results of 2 dose ranging trials in patients with breast or prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 5 (suppl): S 31-35, 1994. 6. Takahashi I, Niibe H, Mitsuhashi N, Ikeda H, Imai K, Yamanaka H. Paliative radiotherapy of bone metastasis. Adv Exp Med Biol 324: 277-282, 1992. 7. Lewington WJ. Targeted radionuclide therapy for bone metastases Eur J Nucl Med 20: 66-74, 1993. 8. Coyle N, Foley K. Pain in patients with cancer: profile of patients and common pain syndromes, Sem Oncol Nurs 1: 93-99, 1985. 9. Hosain F, Spencer RP. Radiopharmaceuticals for palliation of metastatic osseous lesions, biologic and physical background. Sem Nucl Med 22(1): 11-16, 1996. 10. Burnet NG, Williams G, Howard N. Phosphorus-32 for intractable bony pain from carcinoma of the prostate. Clin Oncol 2: 220-223, 1990. 11. Tong EC. Parathormone and P-32 therapy in prostatic cancer with bone metastases. Radiology 98: 343-351, 1971. 12. Tong ECK, Finkelstein P. The treatment of prostatic bony metastases with parathormone and radioactive phosphorus. J Urol 109: 71-75, 1973. 13. Silberstein EB. The treatment of painful osseous metastases with phosphorus 32 labeled phosphates. Semin Oncol 20: 10-21, 1973. 14. Blake GM, Zivanovic MA, McEwan AJ, Ackery DM. Sr-89 therapy: strontium kinetics in disseminated carcinoma of the prostate. Eur J Nucl Med 12: 447-454, 1986. 15. Blake GM, Zivanovic MA, McEwan AJ, Batty VB, Ackery DM. Sr-89 radionuclide therapy: dosimetry and hematological toxicity in two patients with metastasising prostatic carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med 3: 41-46, 1987. 16. Silberstein EB, Williams C. Strontium-89 therapy for the pain of osseous metastases. J Nucl Med 26: 345-348, 1985. 17. Turner JH, Claringbold PG, Hetherington EL, Sorby P, Martindale AA. A phase 1 study of samarium-153 ethylene diamine tetramethylene phosphonate therapy for disseminated skeletal metastases. J Clin Oncol 7: 1926-1931, 1989. 18. Turner JH, Claringbold PG. A phase II study of treatment of painful multifocal skeletal metastases with single and repeated dose Samarium-153 ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonate. Eur J Cancer 27: 1084-1086, 1991. 19. Turner JH, Martindale AA, Sorby P, Hetherington EL, Fleay PH, Hoffman RE, et al. Samarium 153-EDTMP therapy of disseminated skeletal metastasis. Eur J Nuc Med 15: 784-795, 1989. 20. Collins C, Eary JF, Donaldson G, Vernon C, Bush NE, Petersdorf S, et al. Samarium-153 EDTMP in bone metastases of hormone refractory prostate carcinoma: a phase I/II trial. J Nucl Med 34: 1839-1844, 1993. 21. Farhanghi H, Holmes RA, Volkert WA, Logan W, Singh A. Samarium-153 EDTMP: pharmacokinetic, toxicity and pain response using an escalating dose schedule in treatment of metastatic bone cancer. J Nucl Med 33: 1451-1458, 1992. 22. Atkins HL, Mausner LF, Srivastava SC, Meinken CE, Straub RF, Cabahug CJ, et al. Biodistribution of Sn 117m (4+) DTPA for palliative therapy of painful osseous metastases. Radiology 186: 279-283, 1993. 23. Atkins HL, Mausner LF, Meinken GE, Srivastava SC, Klopper JF, Cabahug CJ, et al. Palliation of bone pain with Sn 117m (4+) DTPA. J Nucl Med 35: 37P, 1994. 24. Eisenhut M, Berberich R, Kimming B, Oberhausen E. Iodine-131 labeled diphosphonates for palliative treatment of bone metastasis: II. Preliminary clinical results with iodine-131 BDP3. J Nucl Med 27: 1255-1261, 1986. 25. Maxon HR, Deutsch EA, Thomas SR, Libson K, Lukes SJ, Williams CC, et al. Re-186 (Sn) HEDP for treatment of multiple metastatic foci in bone; human biodistribution and dosimetric studies. Radiology 166: 501-507, 1988. 26. Maxon HR 3d, Schroder LE, Thomas SR, Hertzberg US, Deutsch EA, Scher HI, et al. Re-186 (Sn) HEDP for treatment of painful osseous metastases: initial clinical experience with 20 patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Radiology 176: 155-159, 1990. 27. Maxon HR 3d, Schroder LE, Hertzberg VS, Thomas SR, Englaro EE, Samaratunga R, et al. Rhenium-186 (Sn) HEDP for treatment of painful osseous metastases: results of a double-blind crossover comparison with placebo. J Nucl Med 32: 1877-1881, 1991. 28. Maxon HR 3d. Thomas SR, Hetrzberg VS, Schroder LE, Englaro EE, Samaratunga R, et al. Rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate for the treatment of painful osseous metastases. Semin Nucl Med 22(1): 33-40, 1992. 29. Gupta SR, Zdonczyk DE, Rubino FA. Cranial neuropathy in systemic malignancy in a VA population. Neurology 40: 997-999, 1990. 30. de Klerk JM, van Dijk A, van het Schip AD, Zonneberg BA, van Rijk PP. Pharmocokinetics of rhenium-186 after administration of rhenium-186 to patients with bone metastases. J Nucl Med 33: 646-651, 1992. 31. de Klerk JM, van het Schip AD, Zonnenberg BA, van Dijk A, Stokkel MP, Han SH, et al. Evaluation of thrombocytopenia in patients treated with rhenium-186 HEDP: guidelines for individual dosage recommendations. J Nucl Med 35: 1423-1428. 1994. 32. de Klerk JM, Zonnenberg BA, van het Schip AD, van Dijk A, Han SH, Quirijnen JM, et al. Dose escalation study of rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 35: 1114-1120, 1994. 33. de Klerk JM, van het Schip AD, Zonnenberg BA, van Dijk A, van Rijk PP. Farmacokinetics of Re-186 HEDP; comparison of two formulations in patients with bone metastases. Eur J Nucl Med 20: 876, 1993. 34. Roodt A, Libson K, Cutler C, Deutach E, Thoman SR, Maxon HR. Studies on the mechanism of action of 186-Re (Sn)-HEDP, a new agent for the treatment of painful skeletal metastases. J Nucl Med 30: 732, 1989. 35. Quirinjnen JM, Han SH, Zonnenberg BA, de Klerk JM, van het Schip AD, et al. Efficacy of rhenium-186-etidronate in prostate cancer patients with metastatic bone pain. J Nucl Med 37: 1511-1515, 1996. 36. Moro L, Gazzarrini C, Crivellari D, Galligioni E, Talamini R, de Bernard B. Biochemical markers for detecting bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Clin Chem 39: 131-134, 1993. 37. Hudson MLA. Clinical use of prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 142: 1011-1017, 1989.